HUTCHINSON, Kan. — Although the Reno County Commission met, it had no agenda items to approve. However, commissioners did get more comments on proposed wind farms in Reno County and how the county needs to have a moratorium while it puts together blanket zoning for such facilities.
Amy Brown, who lives near Haven, says the wind giants are receiving tax breaks while the residents being affected are an afterthought:
She also wants this proposed wind farm to be fully vetted before anything is built in Reno County:
One other person spoke during the meeting and was also in favor of a moratorium to stop NextEra from building a wind farm until zoning is in place.
Only two commissioners were present. They made no comments after the two ladies spoke.
Good morning gentlemen, Amy Brown, Haven, Kansas. During last week’s commission meeting, Kristy Horsch, another concerned citizen, formally requested a moratorium be placed on wind farm development. There was also a request to re-evaluate the current zoning regulations that are in place regarding wind farms, as they are insufficient to protect the health of the constituents of this county. Thank you for requesting that the County Planning Commission study a zoning overlay for the County, however, without a Moratorium on wind farm development, the study is useless, as this developer could begin building at their leisure in the un-zoned part of the county and in essence impose the industrial wind facility on the entire county, without giving constituents adequate time to vet out the full impact of living in the shadow of an industrial wind facility as well as understanding the potential or perceived economic benefit. It is imperative that a Moratorium on Wind Farm development be put in place immediately. Time is of the essence, the quality of life, the health and the economic impact on the constituents of this county, which you have a constitutional responsibility to serve and protect, remain in the balance of your choice of activity or passivity. I ask you to move expeditiously on both the matter of a moratorium and the review of current wind farm zoning regulations.
Further, we have requested the promised and perceived economic benefits of the industrial wind facilities, in order to objectively analyze, the “What’s In It for Us”, or the ultimate benefit to the bottom line for Reno County. To date, we have not obtained that information. We do not have the promised PILOT dollars or any other promises made to the county, short of a vague and possibly inaccurate FAQ posted, now in the archived documents section of the Reno County website found at this web address: https://renogov.org/DocumentCenter/View/6184/Nextera-Reno-County-QA-Rev-7_6_18.
Until a solid financial and health impact can be determined for the county again the Moratorium is essential.
– Are property values negatively affected?
Farm animals can graze immediately below a wind turbine because even at the bottom of its swing, the rotor blade is generally more than 100 feet above the ground.
www.renogov.org.
Additionally, a savvy business person, typically understands not only what they are getting, but what they are leaving on the table. The billionaire, Warren Buffet, whom we would all agree is astute, has gone on record in May of 2012, in US News https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/nancy-pfotenhauer/2014/05/12/even-warren-buffet-admits-wind-energy-is-a-bad-investment as saying, “I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire’s tax rate. For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of wind farms. That is the only reason to build them. They don’t make sense without a tax credit.” Let me repeat, “I will do anything that is basically covered by the law to reduce Berkshire’s tax rate. For example, on wind energy, we get a tax credit if we build a lot of industrial wind facilities. That is the only reason to build them.” In providing the lucrative tax incentives to these industrial wind facilities, we are spending taxpayers dollars and the only thing that we are accomplishing is creating a gigantic tax credit for the industrial wind generators while doing nothing to aid in our tax base.
https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/subsidizing-big-wind-real-costs-taxpayers-5752.html#.UGs4Fo6L_do.
Taxpayers are heavily invested in industrial wind generating facilities, actually, tax dollars are funding them on a federal and state level. To make a long story short, what’s in it for us are higher energy bills and no red carpet treatment for normal everyday tax paying residents or businesses, that are adding to the county tax base. Higher electric costs mean a lower quality of life for everyone in the county and the country for that matter. To that end, we must evaluate this looming industrial wind facility in light of the incentives that they are receiving at a federal, state and county level, in essence, the money that is being excluded from our tax base, and compare that to the promises and perceived benefit as well. Mr. Buffet accurately accessed it, the only reason to build a wind farm is a tax credit. The tax base and incentive certainly warrants a thorough understanding, before Reno County allows industrial wind facilities to take hold.
To conclude, I appreciate your action regarding the immediate institution of a Moratorium on industrial wind facilities, a review of current zoning regulations for industrial wind facilities for their scientific basis adequacy of those regulation to protect the constituents of Reno County. Finally, thank you for taking the time to thoroughly review and explore the promised and perceived the financial benefit to the residents of Reno County.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelshellenberger/2018/04/23/if-solar-and-wind-are-so-cheap-why-are-they-making-electricity-more-expensive/#1d3bcaf1dc66.
If Solar And Wind Are So Cheap, Why Are They Making …Between 2009 and 2017, the price of solar per watt declined by 75 percent while the price of wind declined by 50 percent. However, the places that deployed significant quantities of solar and wind … www.forbes.com.